Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/3779
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-01T09:51:12Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-01T09:51:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/3779-
dc.descriptionB.ACCTY.(HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE The rationale behind this study is to analyse in a local context the extent of the usage of foreign VAT refund procedures. On the outset, the study focuses on the introduction of the recently implemented harmonised VAT refund procedure, a mechanism designed to facilitate the recovery of cross-border VAT. Critics believe that the scope of harmonisation was not fully achieved as they allege that users are still facing significant setbacks in the VAT refund procedure. Secondly, the study endeavours to assess the accessibility and complexity of applying for a VAT refund under the Thirteenth VAT Directive and consequently, on the decision of other countries to do business in Malta. Finally the study attempts to determine those factors which are still hindering the two distinct foreign VAT refund mechanisms in an effort to suggest improvements to the existing systems. DESIGN The research was conducted by means of a questionnaire which was distributed amongst 54 audit and accountancy firms, 44 sole practitioners and a selection of 16 Maltese companies in order to gain an understanding of their views and concerns. ii FINDINGS Respondents claimed that although the new VAT refund mechanism was designed to facilitate the VAT recovery process for cross-border activity, they still perceived the process as 'somewhat difficult'. VAT refunds under the Thirteenth VAT Directive, on the other hand were viewed by participants as 'cumbersome' and 'difficult' to apply in practice. They suggested that this was mostly due to the paper-based nature of the refund process. In this respect, even though the same users heavily criticised the new VAT refund procedure, they still advocated that a similar harmonisation process should be undertaken to improve VAT recovery under th a minimum whilst the need to provide supporting documentation should be eliminated. Furthermore, participants suggested that MS should agree on an 'exhaustive list' of expenditure eligible for VAT refund across MS.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectTax refunds -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectValue-added tax -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectTaxation -- Law and legislation -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleAn analysis of foreign VAT refunds : a Maltese perspectiveen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Accountancyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorTheuma, Ruth-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacEma - 2011
Dissertations - FacEMAAcc - 2011

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11BACC079.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.