The role of non-state actors in decision making over the re-registration of the pesticide Glyphosate in the EU. A David vs. Goliath battle?

Abstract

Due to the EUs position in the world economy, regulatory decisions made in the EU are highly relevant for other countries. In recent years, glyphosate has made the headlines several times. Scientists, regulatory authorities and society are deeply divided over the issues surrounding the substance. Controversies over glyphosates safety and its impact on human and environmental health that surfaced over the last years sparked a debate over the possibility of neutral, independent and objective science in risk assessment. By triggering and fuelling this debate, non-governmental actors, especially environmental non-governmental organisations, seriously challenge not only EU practices in risk regulation but also (and especially) the traditional role of science and experts advise in public policy. Looking at how non-state actors have mobilised knowledge as a resource, this study looks at how environmental movements challenge the existing elite of experts and thereby promote not only green politics but also further the democratic progress in the EU.