Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/4259
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-23T09:11:03Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-23T09:11:03Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/4259-
dc.descriptionB.ACCTY.(HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractReactions to recent corporate scandals have led the public and stakeholders to expect organisations to take a 'no fraud tolerance' attitude. However, SMEs are believed by many to lack internal controls. This study attempts to identify which of a selected list of fraud prevention and detection procedures are mainly used by SMEs in two sectors - Construction and Professional Services. It also sets out to determine whether any significant differences emerge both between the two targeted sectors and within differently-sized firms inside each of the two sectors. The objectives of this study were sought through a questionnaire distributed among 51 Construction companies and 30 Professional Services companies. From the study it emerged that the Professional Services SME sector was much stronger then the Construction SME sector with regards to the adoption of fraud prevention and detection procedures. In fact, several significant differences emerged. These imply that in the areas where they occurred, Professional Services SMEs were more likely to engage in fraud prevention and detection procedures. Significant differences also emerged within both sectors. Therefore, this study shows that one should consider the size and especially the sector in which an SME is operating before generalizing on its application of fraud prevention and detection procedures. While the Professional Services SMEs apply fraud prevention and detection procedures to a larger extent than Construction SMEs, there are still essential procedures which are lacking in both sectors. This study recommends that both sectors should work harder towards establishing fraud contingency response plans, since acting with anger and without any constructive directions when fraud is identified could lead to the end of the company.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectFraud -- Preventionen_GB
dc.subjectSmall business -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectAuditing, Internal -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleThe prevention and detection of fraud in selected Maltese SMEs : a studyen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy. Department of Accountancyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorTabone, Marlene-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacEma - 2009
Dissertations - FacEMAAcc - 2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
09BACC072.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.54 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.