Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRupeika-Apoga, Ramona-
dc.contributor.authorZaidi, S. H.-
dc.contributor.authorThalassinos, Y. E.-
dc.contributor.authorThalassinos, E. I.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-30T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationRupeika-Apoga, R., Zaidi, S. H., Thalassinos, Y. E., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2018). Bank stability : the case of Nordic and non-Nordic banks in Latvia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6(2), 39-55.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn22414754-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/43729-
dc.description.abstractThe banking industry is facing huge challenges due to technology-enabled innovation, to changes in customer preferences, to bank de-risking and to new regulatory initiatives. To go through all these changes, banks need to be stable. The present study contributes to the empirical literature by identifying the determinants of stability of banks in the Latvian Banking Industry. This study covers both bank-specific (endogenous) factors and macroeconomic (exogenous) factors that impact the stability of banks. The data set used in this study is the annual financial statements of Latvian banks operated in the period 2003-2016. Using multivariate regression analysis techniques, we found evidence that credit risk and efficiency ratio have a significant negative impact on banks’ stability, whereas size of the bank, liquidity ratio, profitability, inflation and GDP growth have significant positive impact on bank’s stability. We made comparison of bank-specific variables performance for Nordic-owned and non-Nordic-owned banks. Credit and liquidity risks, as well as efficiency ratio for Nordic-owned banks during the research period were higher, whereas size of the banks and profitability were better. Comparing measurement results of stability of banks, we received that Nordic-owned banks performance between 2003 to 2016 was better than non-Nordic-owned banks performance.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEleftherios Thalassinosen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBanks and banking -- Latviaen_GB
dc.subjectFinancial statements -- Latviaen_GB
dc.subjectRisk managementen_GB
dc.subjectBank management -- Latviaen_GB
dc.subjectCredit -- Latviaen_GB
dc.subjectLiquidity (Economics)en_GB
dc.titleBank stability : the case of Nordic and non-Nordic banks in Latviaen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.publication.titleInternational Journal of Economics and Business Administrationen_GB
Appears in Collections:IJEBA, Volume 6, Issue 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bank_Stability_The_Case_of_Nordic_and_Non_Nordic_Banks_in_Latvia_2018.pdf357.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.