When intra-partum electronic fetal monitoring becomes court business

Abstract

Sadly but inevitably, the clinical fruit of all scientific research, like the profile of the Roman god Janus, presents us with two faces - one is patient benefit while the other is medico-legal vulnerability. As part of defensive medicine, there are situations where malpractice risk is minimised by actual elimination of certain high-risk procedures e.g. in the case of some neurosurgical operations. Intra-partum electronic fetal monitoring (IPEFM) is the commonest obstetric procedure in the developed world, producing valuable information of fetal well being as co-related to maternal uterine activity with a scope of guarding fetal well-being in labour. It is a prime example of the therapeutic/ legal liability duality which haunts modern Medicine.