Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45341
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGould, Simon W. J.-
dc.contributor.authorCuschieri, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorRollason, Jess-
dc.contributor.authorHilton, Anthony C.-
dc.contributor.authorEasmon, Sue-
dc.contributor.authorFielder, Mark D.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T09:41:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-31T09:41:33Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationGould, S. W., Cuschieri, P., Rollason, J., Hilton, A. C., Easmon, S., & Fielder, M. D. (2010). The need for continued monitoring of antibiotic resistance patterns in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from London and Malta. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 9(20), 1-7.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45341-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antibiotic resistance is an increasing problem in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) worldwide. In 2001 The National Health Service in the UK introduced a mandatory bacteraemia surveillance scheme for the reporting of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This surveillance initiative reports on the percentage of isolates that are methicillin resistant. However, resistance to other antibiotics is not currently reported and therefore the scale of emerging resistance is currently unclear in the UK. In this study, multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) profiles against fourteen antimicrobial drugs were investigated for 705 isolates of S. aureus collected from two European study sites in the UK (London) and Malta. Results: All isolates were susceptible to linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin. Multiple antibiotic resistance profiles from both countries were determined, a total of forty-two and forty-five profiles were seen in the UK cohort (MRSA and MSSA respectively) and comparatively, sixty-two and fifty-two profiles were shown in the Maltese group. The largest MAR profile contained six antibiotics (penicillin G, methicillin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin and clarithromycin) and was observed in the MRSA isolates in both the UK and Maltese cohorts. Conclusion: The data presented here suggests that the monitoring of changing resistance profiles locally in maintaining treatment efficacy to resistant pathogens.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAntibacterial agentsen_GB
dc.subjectBacteremiaen_GB
dc.subjectMicrobial sensitivity testsen_GB
dc.subjectStaphylococcal infectionsen_GB
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureusen_GB
dc.titleThe need for continued monitoring of antibiotic resistance patterns in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from London and Maltaen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1476-0711-9-20-
dc.publication.titleAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobialsen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - ERCMedPat



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.