Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarb, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorAmadéo, Brice-
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Arno A.-
dc.contributor.authorDrapier, Nico-
dc.contributor.authorVankerckhoven, Vanessa V. J.-
dc.contributor.authorDavey, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorGoossens, Herman-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T10:16:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-28T10:16:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationZarb, P., Amadeo, B., Muller, A., Drapier, N., Vankerckhoven, V., Davey, P., & Goossens, H. (2012). Antifungal therapy in European hospitals: data from the ESAC point-prevalence surveys 2008 and 2009. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 18(10), E389-E395.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45975-
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to identify targets for quality improvement in antifungal use in European hospitals and determine the variability of such prescribing. Hospitals that participated in the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Point Prevalence Surveys (ESACPPS) were included. The WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification for ‘antimycotics for systemic use’ (J02) 2009 version was used. Demographic data and information about indications and diagnoses were collected in 2008 and 2009. From 99 053 patients, 29 324 (29.6%) received antimicrobials. Antifungals represented 1529 of 40 878 (3.7%) antimicrobials. Antifungals were mainly (54.2%) administered orally. Hospital-acquired infections represented 44.5% of indications for antifungals followed by medical prophylaxis at 31.2%. The site of infection was not defined in 36.0% of cases but the most commonly targeted sites were respiratory (19.2%) and gastrointestinal (18.8%). The most used antifungal was fluconazole (60.5%) followed by caspofungin (10.5%). Antifungal–antibacterial combinations were frequently used (77.5%). The predominance of fluconazole use in participating hospitals could result in an increase in prevalence of inherently resistant fungi, increasing the need for newer antifungals. Although acknowledging that antifungal prophylaxis in the immunocompromised host needs further exploration, repetitive surveys using ESAC-PPS methodology may help to monitor the effects of interventions set to regulate antifungal use.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe ESAC project was supported by a grant from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC; Grant Agreement 2007/001).en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAntifungal agents -- Therapeutic use -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectNosocomial infections -- Surveys -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectMedical care -- Research -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectHospital care -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectFluconazoleen_GB
dc.titleAntifungal therapy in European hospitals : data from the ESAC point-prevalence surveys 2008 and 2009en_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.contributor.corpauthorESAC-3 PPS Hospital Care Study Groupen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03973.x-
dc.publication.titleClinical Microbiology and Infectionen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SPat



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.