Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZerafa, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorGalea, Pauline-
dc.contributor.authorSebu, Cristiana-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T06:57:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-02T06:57:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.citationZerafa, C., Galea, P., & Sebu, C. (2019). Learning to invert pseudo-spectral data for seismic waveforms. Xjenza, 7(1), 3-17.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46922-
dc.description.abstractFull-waveform inversion (FWI) is a widely adopted technique used in seismic processing to produce high resolution Earth models, that fully explain the recorded seismic data. FWI is a local optimisation problem which aims to minimise, using a least-squares approach, the misfit between recorded and modelled data. The inversion process begins with a best-guess initial model which is iteratively improved using a sequence of linearised local inversions to solve a fully non-linear problem. Deep learning has gained widespread popularity in the new millennium. At the core of these tools are Neural Networks (NN), in particular Deep Neural Networks (DNN), which are variants of these original NN algorithms with significantly more hidden layers, resulting in efficient learning of a non-linear function between input and output pairs. The learning process within DNN involves repeatedly updating network neuron weights to best approximate input-to-output mappings. There is clear similarity between FWI and DNN as both approaches attempt to solve non-linear mapping in an iterative sense. However, they are fundamentally different in that FWI is knowledge-driven, whereas DNN is data-driven. This article proposes a novel approach which learns pseudo-spectral data-driven FWI. We test this methodology by training a DNN on 1D multi-layer, horizontally-isotropic data and then apply this to previously unseen data to infer the surface velocity. Results are compared against a synthetic model and success and failures of this approach are hence identified.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMalta Chamber of Scientistsen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectNeural networks (Computer science)en_GB
dc.subjectSeismic waves -- Mathematical modelsen_GB
dc.subjectSeismic waves -- Data processingen_GB
dc.subjectMachine learningen_GB
dc.subjectGeophysics -- Data processingen_GB
dc.titleLearning to invert pseudo-spectral data for seismic waveformsen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.7423/XJENZA.2019.1.01-
dc.publication.titleXjenzaen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacSciGeo
Scholarly Works - FacSciMat
Xjenza, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1
Xjenza, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Xjenza7(1)A1.pdf10.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.