Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/49440
Title: International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries : should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age?
Authors: Mohangoo, Ashna D.
Blondel, Béatrice
Gissler, Mika
Velebil, Petr
Macfarlane, Alison
Zeitlin, Jennifer
Keywords: Gestational age
Newborn infants -- Death
Birth weight
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Mohangoo, A. D., Blondel, B., Gissler, M., Velebil, P., Macfarlane, A., Zeitlin, J., & Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. (2013). International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries: should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age?. PloS One, 8(5), 1-7.
Abstract: Background: Fetal and neonatal mortality rates are essential indicators of population health, but variations in recording of births and deaths at the limits of viability compromises international comparisons. The World Health Organization recommends comparing rates after exclusion of births with a birth weight less than 1000 grams, but many analyses of perinatal outcomes are based on gestational age. We compared the effects of using a 1000-gram birth weight or a 28-week gestational age threshold on reported rates of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe. Methods: Aggregated data from 2004 on births and deaths tabulated by birth weight and gestational age from 29 European countries/regions participating in the Euro-Peristat project were used to compute fetal and neonatal mortality rates using cut-offs of 1000-grams and 28-weeks (2.8 million total births). We measured differences in rates between and within countries using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Principal Findings: For fetal mortality, rates based on gestational age were significantly higher than those based on birth weight (p,0.001), although these differences varied between countries. The use of a 1000-gram threshold included 8823 fetal deaths compared with 9535 using a 28-week threshold (difference of 712). In contrast, the choice of a cut-off made little difference for comparisons of neonatal deaths (difference of 16). Neonatal mortality rates differed minimally, by under 0.1 per 1000 in most countries (p = 0.370). Country rankings were comparable with both thresholds. Conclusions: Neonatal mortality rates were not affected by the choice of a threshold. However, the use of a 1000-gram threshold underestimated the health burden of fetal deaths. This may in part reflect the exclusion of growth restricted fetuses. In high-income countries with a good measure of gestational age, using a 28-week threshold may provide additional valuable information about fetal deaths occurring in the third trimester.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/49440
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - ERCMedGen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
International_comparisons_of_fetal_and_neonatal_mortality_rates_in_high_income_countries.PDF286.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.