Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/50018
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchembri, Emanuel-
dc.contributor.authorMassalha, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorCamilleri, Liberato-
dc.contributor.authorCasha, Marylin-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07T08:21:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-07T08:21:38Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citationSchembri, E., Massalha, V., Camilleri, L., & Casha, M. (2019). The Maltese version of the DN4 questionnaire : initial validation to assess neuropathic pain in patients with chronic spinal or spinal-radicular pain. Malta Medical School Gazette, 3(3), 37-52.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/50018-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Neuropathic pain is frequently encountered in patients with spinal and spinal-related pain which needs specific treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study was to do an initial linguistic translation and validation of the Maltese DN4 questionnaire to diagnose neuropathic pain in this population. Methods: The study was designed as a single-blinded, observational, prospective collected data and retrospective analysis. The English and French DN4 questionnaires underwent forward and backward translation, literal assessment and adaptation of the semantic equivalence into the Maltese language, followed by assessment of the Maltese DN4 during the initial patient assessment in patients who met the inclusion criteria. Results: The total Maltese DN4 score obtained a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.735 therefore having satisfactory internal consistency. Test-retest using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (95% CI) ranged from 0.975 to 0.991 (p=0.000), while inter-rater agreement using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (95% CI) ranged from 0.986 to 0.995 (p=0.000). Test-retest reliability yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) ranging from 0.975 to 0.991 (p < 0.001), while inter-rater reliability yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) ranging from 0.986 to 0.995 (p < 0.001). Both the English and the Maltese DN4 questionnaires obtained the same sensitivity and specificity values of 0.422 and 0.941 respectively, and a positive likehood ratio of 7.153 and a negative likehood ratio of 0.614, at a cutoff score of 4. Conclusion: The results of this study support the transcultural internal consistency, inter-rater, test-retest reliability, validity of the Maltese DN4 questionnaire to differentiate between neuropathic and nociceptive pain in patients with chronic spinal and spinal-radicular pain. Therefore, this simple tool can be used both in daily clinical practice but also in the clinical research setting to quickly screen for neuropathic pain.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Malta. Medical Schoolen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectNeuralgia -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectRadiculopathy -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectValidation therapyen_GB
dc.subjectBackache -- Diagnosisen_GB
dc.titleThe Maltese version of the DN4 questionnaire : initial validation to assess neuropathic pain in patients with chronic spinal or spinal-radicular painen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.publication.titleMalta Medical School Gazetteen_GB
Appears in Collections:MMSG, Volume 3, Issue 3
MMSG, Volume 3, Issue 3
Scholalry Works - FacHScPhy
Scholarly Works - FacM&SSur
Scholarly Works - FacSciSOR

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MMSG3(3)A5.pdfMain text1.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
MMSG3(3)A5Appendix1.pdfAppendix 1887.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
MMSG3(3)A5Appendix2.pdfAppendix 2890.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.