Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/5307
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-05T08:38:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-05T08:38:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/5307 | - |
dc.description | B.COM.(HONS)MARKETING | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose - The purpose of this study is to discover the different reactions consumers have towards different methods of advertising, specifically video and print advertisements, within the automotive industry. Design/methodology/approach - This study starts by exploring literature about the automotive industry, neuromarketing and neurophysiological tools. Electroencephalography, Galvanic Skin Response and Eye Tracking were used to gather data which was then analysed and compared to existing literature. Findings - The results of this study highlight the natural reactions of male and female participants to different types of advertising stimuli. The study shows that both video and print advertising caused negative reactions and sheds light on which parts of advertisements are focused on. The findings also show that the difference these stimuli have on men and women is relatively insignificant. Research limitation/implications - The use of neurophysiological equipment meant that tests were carried out in a laboratory and thus advertisements were not experienced in their natural setting. Future studies to consider further forms of advertising and other factors related to presenting an advertisement, such as costs and resources needed, even in different industries. Practical implications - Previous studies traditionally use other ways of gathering data. The use of neurophysiological tools allow for scientific results that may be used by the industry as a starting point to build their marketing campaigns. Originality/value - Firms operating in the automotive industry must reconsider their methods of communicating with their target audience and focus on methods that are found to be pleasant and likeable. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Neuromarketing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Advertising | en_GB |
dc.subject | Consumers -- Research | en_GB |
dc.title | How do consumers’ reactions differ between video and printed advertisements, specifically in the automotive industry? | en_GB |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Marketing | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Farrugia, Bertram | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacEMAMar - 2014 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
14BMRK013.pdf Restricted Access | 17.44 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.