Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/5770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T10:35:45Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-23T10:35:45Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-
dc.identifier.citationTHINK. 2012. (3.) p. 11en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/5770-
dc.description.abstractThe draft Bill on IVF (in vitro fertilisation) was supposed to regulate a medical procedure. Yet, its very name 'Protection of Embroys Act' reflects that the concern lies with the embroy's status rather than with IVF itself.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectTheologiansen_GB
dc.subjectFertilization in vitroen_GB
dc.subjectBioethicsen_GB
dc.titleLessons from legislation on IVF : a personal perspectiveen_GB
dc.title.alternativeOpinionen_GB
dc.typecontributionToPeriodicalen_GB
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorMallia, Pierre-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SFM
Think Magazine, Issue 3
Think Magazine, Issue 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11.pdf108.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.