Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/59519
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBorg, John Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorLaslop, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorPani, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorMaciulaitis, Romaldas-
dc.contributor.authorMelchiorri, Daniela-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T10:30:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-17T10:30:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBorg, J. J., Laslop, A., Pani, L., Maciulaitis, R., & Melchiorri, D. (2014). Reflections on decisions made on the well-established use of medicinal products by EU Regulators and the ECJ. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 82(3), 655-664.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/59519-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the European Union (EU), a medicinal product needs a marketing authorization (MA) to be placed on the market. The EU’s medicinal products’ legislative framework allows for a reduced application for medicines outside their data exclusivity. One such type of application is the well-established use (WEU) medicinal product application (i.e. bibliographic applications). Recently, these MA applications have been subject to arbitration procedures at the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) because of disagreements between member states during the authorisation process. This paper reflects on these cases and highlights their potential impact on future WEU applications. Methods: Decisions adopted by the European Commission on WEU applications between 2009 and 2012 were identified from the EU Community Register on medicinal products for human use. Subsequently, decisions were reviewed to understand the potential serious risk to public health (PSRPH) that EU regulators raised during MA application procedures. Results: Four decisions were adopted by the EU commission between 2009 and 2012. Three followed disagreements between member states on PSRPH grounds. One decision was the outcome of a centralised marketing authorisation application. Six key messages were identified from the four cases reviewed and presented. Conclusion: A guideline on WEU to implement the technical specifications to fulfil Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC for MA applications is not available. Thus, reflections on recent decisions on WEU applications provide scientific direction to the industry as well as the medicinal product regulators on the documentation required to successfully file and obtain a WEU MA.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOsterreichische Apotheker-Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectMedicine -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectAdministrative agencies -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectPublic health -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectDrug utilization – Europeen_GB
dc.subjectGeneric drugsen_GB
dc.subjectMedical auditen_GB
dc.subjectRisk communicationen_GB
dc.titleReflections on decisions made on the well-established use of medicinal products by EU regulators and the ECJen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3797/scipharm.1402-14-
dc.publication.titleScientia Pharmaceuticaen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - ERCMedGen



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.