Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/59761
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T10:08:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-24T10:08:22Z-
dc.date.issued1981-
dc.identifier.citationDingli, K.F. (1981). A comparative review of the granting of bail (Master’s dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/59761-
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractWith the progress of civilization and the international campaign for the recognition of human rights, the individual accused person has come to be considered as the very subject - rather than the object - of the criminal process. Modern democratic legislatures? in regulating the penal process, are now primarily preoccupied with defining precise limits : to the power of state organs while at the same time establishing rigorous guarantees for individual citizens, thus transforming their Codes of criminal procedure into essential Codes of Liberty. It is today well recognised that individual rights may only be restricted in the 'public interest',within the limits and to the extent to which such restrictions are effectively and indispensably necessary. This 'pro libertatem' trend has given rise to many in-built conflicts within the system, and has aptly lead Professor Caleb Foote to caution that: - "The resolution in criminal procedure of the rights of the individual with the legitimate interests of the state requires the maintenance of a delicate balance" (1). There are not many occasions on which the clash between the interests of the individual and those of the state can take on such violent forms as after the commission of a crime; for when a person is suspected of having committed a criminal offence, his basic right to liberty, 'inter alia', may often be intruded upon in the name of criminal investigation.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal procedureen_GB
dc.subjectBailen_GB
dc.subjectCourtsen_GB
dc.titleA comparative review of the granting of bailen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorDingli, Kevin F.-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 1958-2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dingli_Kevin_F_A comparative review of the granting of bail.pdf
  Restricted Access
7.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.