Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/61675
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T12:39:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-13T12:39:24Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationDeguara, K. (2001). The unfair prejudice remedy Section 402 of the Companies Act 1995 (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/61675-
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is an attempt to study the possible interpretation of the unfair prejudice remedy as found in the new section 402 of the Companies Act 1995. To this end reference is often made to foreign case law and legal literature. Before dealing in detail with the provision, the introductory chapter discusses the position of an aggrieved minority shareholder under the Commercial Partnerships Ordinance. Reference is here made to the power of the court to order the dissolution and consequent winding up of a company if there existed, in the court's opinion, grounds of sufficient gravity to warrant such dissolution. Chapter 2 then focuses on the potential interpretation of the provision. This chapter is intended as a starting point for a better understanding of this remedy. In addition, this chapter includes some tentative suggestions about one of the central problems with the unfair prejudice remedy. This is the problem of determining the rationale for the rule that independent of any provision in the articles, majorities are prevented from acting in an oppressive or unfairly prejudicial way towards any minority of the shareholders. Emphasis is put on the legitimate expectations of the members to the commercial enterprise. This is done in the light of the UK Court's decision in Ebrahimi v. Westbourne Galleries [1973] AC 360 where it was recognised that the legitimate expectations of shareholders may give rise to limitations on the capacity of the majority to make decisions that are oppressive on the minority. Chapter 3 talks about the potential orders the court may give when it is satisfied • that the member's interests have been unfairly prejudiced and it deems it just and equitable to give an order. The final chapter considers the amendments put forward by the UK Law Commission, in its paper Shareholder Remedies no. 246 (1997), to the unfair prejudice provision in the UK. This brief analysis is done in the light of the possible implications to the Maltese commercial law field if some of these amendments were adopted by the Maltese legislator.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCorporation law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectLiability (Law) -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectLiquidation -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectRemedies (Law) -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleThe unfair prejudice remedy Section 402 of the Companies Act 1995en_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorDeguara, Kevin-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 1958-2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Deguara_Kevin_THE UNFAIR PREJUDICE REMEDY SECTION 402 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995.pdf
  Restricted Access
8.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.