Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/62200
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T06:38:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-20T06:38:11Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationPhyall, J. (2005). Diminished responsibility (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/62200-
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractAll criminal law systems today recognise that an insane person cannot be held criminally responsible for his actions due to his incapacity to use his mental faculties to determine his conduct, albeit to different degrees. Not all such systems, however, consider a partial incapacity to do so as conductive to a decrease in one's criminal responsibility. In a number of Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions such a condition is given formal recognition through diminished responsibility, a partial defence which reduces murder to manslaughter. It is the purpose of this dissertation to consider whether the situation obtaining at Maltese law today is such as to require the introduction of diminished responsibility. In Chapter One an outline of the development and the conditions which determined its adoption by Scots' and English law will be given, together with a brief consideration as to what the possible future of this partial defence in Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions is likely to be. The main elements of diminished responsibility will be explored in Chapter Two. Though the discussion will be kept as general as possible, particular reference will be had to the elements which must concur for its successful pleading at English law so as to highlight as well the main difficulties which have plagued diminished responsibility and which have limited its adoption by more jurisdictions than at present do. Chapter Three will consist m considering whether it is correct to consider particular institutes of our criminal law as being instances in which diminished responsibility finds application. Chapter Four will consider whether there were instances in the past wherein the adoption of diminished responsibility, or similar institutes, was proposed. The present situation will also to be taken into account so as to determine whether the necessity exists today for such a defence and, if it so does, whether it should find application limitedly as an excuse to wilful homicide or as a wider available defence. In concluding a number of proposals will be made which, it is felt, would ensure the better administration of justice.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal law -- Great Britainen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal liability -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal liability -- Great Britainen_GB
dc.subjectInsanity (Law) -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectInsanity (Law) -- Great Britainen_GB
dc.titleDiminished responsibilityen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorPhyall, Jonathan-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 1958-2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Phyall_Jonathan_DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY.pdf
  Restricted Access
5.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.