Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/6608
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:13:49Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:13:49Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/6608
dc.descriptionLL.M.EUR.COMP.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will examine the development, identification of shortcomings and the road to reform in air passenger rights legislation as highlighted in public consultations and relevant commission communications. Much of the thesis focuses on Regulation 261/2004 which entered into force in 2005, and provides for compensation and assistance to passengers who are denied boarding, whose flights are cancelled, or whose flights are subjected to delays. However, since its entry into force, the application, interpretation and even the validity of key provisions of the Regulation became the subject of controversy. The first chapter discusses delays, cancellations and denied boarding. The Regulation contains lacunaes which led to divergent interpretations, and the complexity of the rules led to a negative effect on passenger rights. Much focus is placed on the relationship between delay and cancellation, on the definition of extraordinary circumstances, on the issue of compensation for delays and finally on the way keywords have been interpreted. The second chapter analyzes the reform required with regards to bagging. Most of the rules relating to the delay, loss and damage to luggage are defined in the Montreal Convention, which was implemented into EU law by Regulation 889/2002. Apart from a number of limitations to the airlines liability and no definition of what constitutes luggage, the Convention is silent on issues such as assistance in case of delayed or lost luggage. The question of whether passengers should be left the choice to take out such insurance or whether it is preferable to have standardised forms of assistance provided by the airlines is also dealt in this part of the thesis. Chapter three deals with the measures that are needed to improve the enforcement of the Regulation. The lack in the uniformity enforcement of the Regulation affects the passengers' means to obtain redress. Linked with the right of redress is management of passenger's complaints, which is currently trailing behind as there are no specific rules to be observed by the National Enforcement Bodies with regard to complaint handling. The Thesis addresses these issues by analyzing the proposed Directive on alternative dispute resolution, the Regulation on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes, the enactment of contingency plans and the creation of a specific enforcement body for baggage. Chapter four examines the considerable and unreasonable economic burden on airlines, which may be passed on to passengers in the form of higher fares notably due to carriers' unlimited obligations with respect to care and assistance in cases of extraordinary circumstances, and the fact that the current system of shared liability within the aviation industry is being hindered by contract limitations.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAeronautics, Commercial -- Law and legislation -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectAeronautics, Commercial -- Government policy -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectConsumer protection -- Law and legislation -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.titleAn evaluation of air passenger rights within the European Unionen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorStafrace, Andrew (2012)
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2012
Dissertations - FacLawEC - 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12MLEC010.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.