Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/665
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Depasquale, Ruben | - |
dc.contributor.author | Crockford, Malcolm P. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T14:17:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T14:17:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Malta Medical Journal. 2005, Vol.17(4), p. 36-38 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/665 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Radiology request forms are essential communication tools used by doctors referring patients for radiological investigations. Their importance, however, is highly underestimated. We set out to perform a process audit of the adequacy of completion of such request forms in St. Luke's Hospital, Malta. Methods: A representative sample of 200 randomly selected request forms received by the radiology department in early September 2004 was reviewed. These included requests for a variety of examinations from different departments within St. Luke's Hospital. A database of the collected forms was created, noting which of the various fields were adequately completed. Results: Only 4% of the 200 request forms reviewed were completed in full. The percentages of the various fields completed were: patient's name and surname - 100%; patient's full address - 77%; patient's age - 29%; referring ward - 95%; referring doctor's signature - 100%; referring doctor's name and surname - 34%; name of responsible consultant - 91%; question to be answered - 25%. The patient's clinical background field was filled in 93%. However, these were more often than not incomplete and unable to fulfil their purpose. Conclusions: There is ample room for change in current local practice. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Malta Medical Journal | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Communication in medicine -- Audit | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiology, Medical -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiology, Medical -- Medical protocols | en_GB |
dc.title | Are Radiology request forms adequately filled in? : an audit assessing local practice | en_GB |
dc.type | article | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | - |
Appears in Collections: | MMJ, Volume 17, Issue 4 MMJ, Volume 17, Issue 4 Scholarly Works - FacM&SSur |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2005.Vol17.Issue4.A7.pdf | Are Radiology request forms adequately filled in?: an audit assessing local practice | 91.79 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.