Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/73164
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T11:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-07T11:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationBugeja, D. F. (2007). Covering paintings with protective materials : an evaluation of backing, glazing and total enclosure practices with particular reference to the Maltese context (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/73164-
dc.descriptionM.CONS.en_GB
dc.description.abstractCultural material can be preserved only if maintained in adequate environments. This dissertation presents possible solutions to how the relative humidity (RH) and temperature of exhibited canvas paintings can be stabilised and retained within the recommended values in order to limit conservation problems such as cracking and detachment of the paint layer from the canvas support. The stability of the RH and temperature inside the museum can be improved by several passive and active means. However, such stability is often challenging, especially if the museum is limited in resources or if the building itself can not sufficiently shelter its interior from the external climatic conditions. When there are such limitations in stabilising the RH and temperature of the entire museum space, there is the possibility of covermg paintings with protective materials to improve the paintings' microenvironment. This dissertation explains how the protective-covering practice can improve the paintings' microenvironment and explores both the advantages and limitations of different protective-covering systems. The author tested a dummy canvas painting covered with backing and glazing materials inside a typical Maltese exhibiting environment, featuring unstable RH and temperature values. It was observed that the daily RH fluctuations of the exhibiting environment were considerably stabilised inside the protective-covering system. However, the RH of the covered painting was still influenced by the museum's seasonal RH fluctuations. As a consequence, the RH of the covered painting gradually rose above 65% and was stabilised at such a high value for almost three consecutive months, possibly posing the covered painting to biodeterioration risks.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectPainting -- Conservation and restoration -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectGlazing -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectHumidity -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleCovering paintings with protective materials : an evaluation of backing, glazing and total enclosure practices with particular reference to the Maltese contexten_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty for the Built Environment. Department of Conservation and Built Heritageen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorBugeja, David Frank (2007)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacBen - 1970-2018
Dissertations - FacBenCBH - 1997-2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
M.CONS._Bugeja_David Frank_2007.pdf
  Restricted Access
23.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.