Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/73992
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Attard, Stephanie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Couto, Jose Guilherme | - |
dc.contributor.author | MacKay, Stuart | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zarb, Francis | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-16T07:11:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-16T07:11:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Attard, S., Couto, J. G., MacKay, S., & Zarb, F. (2017). Anatomic site markers: evaluation of their use among Maltese radiographers. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(1), 30-38. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/73992 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To evaluate the perception and 5-year application of anatomic side markers (ASMs) by radiographers in Malta. Methods and materials: Phase 1 involved a longitudinal, retrospective observation of a stratified sample of radiographs over 5 years, using a self-designed data record sheet to record features of the placement of ASMs. Phase 2 consisted of a cross-sectional, prospective self-designed questionnaire evaluating the radiographers’ perception on the use of ASMs in professional practice. Results: In phase 1, radiographs (n ¼ 500) were selected from 234,105 taken over the 5-year period (error: 4.38%; 95% confidence level). Four hundred thirty radiographs (86%) had evidence of markers, of which 110 (25.6%) had a pre-exposure marker and 320 (74.4%) had a postprocessed marker. The remaining 14% had no evidence of any markers. Two hundred eighty two (56.4%) of the radiographs had ASMs placed according to recommended guidelines by Ballinger, Frank, and Merrill. In phase 2, most radiographers (84.6%) preferred using postprocessing markers, with 15.4% preferring pre-exposure markers (76.6% of radiographers found applying pre-exposure markers time consuming). Sixty percent (60.5%) of radiographers gave correct answers on use of markers as recommended in the guidelines. Conclusions: Radiographer preference in using postprocessing markers was evident, while the use of pre-exposure markers was seen to be influenced by time of examination, projection executed, and patient positioning. Radiographer awareness and continuous training are recommended. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Human anatomy -- Models -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | X-rays | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiography, Medical -- Image quality | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiography, Medical -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.title | Anatomic site markers : evaluation of their use among Maltese radiographers | en_GB |
dc.type | article | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.006 | - |
dc.publication.title | Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacHScRad |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anatomic_site_markers.pdf Restricted Access | 469.14 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.