Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-26T09:34:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-26T09:34:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gatt, I.J. (2020). Sustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages (Bachelor's dissertation). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733 | - |
dc.description | B.ENG (HONS) | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | The importance of sustainability has become increasingly relevant in past years, with the government, businesses, and the general public alike striving to improve their environmental footprint in various aspects of their life. This sense of sustainable urgency also applies to the cosmetic industry, which contributes significantly to the global plastic manufactured and used worldwide. The main tool used to assess the proposed methodology was the life cycle analysis (LCA). The primary goal of this study was to analyse the total life cycle environmental impact of a reusable cosmetic product and a recyclable cosmetic product. This was done by creating several different versions of the existing cosmetic product being analysed, with each version housing a specific attribute change. Some examples of the attribute alterations include applying different rates of dematerialisation, adding recycling potential, and altering the product’s design to study the effect that this has on sustainability. In total seven versions were proposed, including the original existing version which was treated as the benchmark. Results showed that the most environmentally friendly version proved to be the design which eliminated the use of the pan altogether, thus allowing the cosmetic powder to be inserted directly into the case itself. However, this was deemed as not being entirely realistic, since the pan component design cannot be altered easily. Thus, the most environmental version resulted in being the version which is both reusable and recyclable. In addition to this, the variation of the environmental footprint with regards to all phases of the plastic cosmetic product’s life cycle, i.e. raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, use, and end of life, were also analysed. It was found that throughout all the seven versions, the biggest contributor by far was contributed to the raw material extraction and manufacturing stages. Furthermore, the effect of how altering different parameters such as the manufacturing location, and end of life location were studied. Results showed that manufacturing in Malta proved to be 13% more environmentally friendly than manufacturing in China, and that using and disposing of this product in Europe proved to be on average 44% more environmentally friendly then the proposed alternative in the United States of America. Finally, the cost aspect of sustainability was also discussed by using the life cycle costing tool. In summary, this exercise found that the highest part contributor to the case assembly was the mirror, and that manufacturing in China proved to be cheaper overall than manufacturing in Malta. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Cosmetics -- Packaging | en_GB |
dc.subject | Recycling (Waste, etc.) | en_GB |
dc.subject | Sustainability | en_GB |
dc.subject | Cosmetics containers | en_GB |
dc.title | Sustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages | en_GB |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Engineering. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Gatt, Isaac Jordan (2020) | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacEng - 2020 Dissertations - FacEngIME - 2020 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
20BENGME015 -Isaac-Jordan Gatt.pdf Restricted Access | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.