Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/76893
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T12:45:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T12:45:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationGauci, M. (2020). Voting machine for people with disabilities (Bachelor's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/76893-
dc.descriptionB.Sc. IT (Hons)(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractAt present, the only methods of casting a vote in a Maltese election is by paper ballot, braille ballot or an audio guide. If a person is unable to vote on their own using one of these mechanisms, they are provided assistance by an electoral representative in the vote casting process. This procedure blocks the citizens from their right to a secret vote by forcing the citizens to reveal their vote to the representative. Furthermore, people suffering from severe visual impairment have no means of verifying that their intended vote is being cast. This study’s aim is to create an interface for a voting machine located at the polling station which will allow citizens with disabilities to vote unassisted. A participatory design process, which includes the target audience and experts in accessibility, is used to ensure the accessibility of the artefacts. The approach taken is iterative where the designs are refined into more usable and accessible prototypes. The prototypes will also increase in fidelity; hence, the final prototype will look closest to a fully functional interface. The changes are based on feedback provided by the accessibility experts or the results of the user testing. During the user testing, the prototypes are measured in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction. Some issues were encountered when carrying out the user tests, therefore, the number of testers and the conditions under which the tests were held are not ideal. Using the high-fidelity prototype, the testers were able to cast the intended vote in under five minutes. All testers were also able to make the instructed changes to the vote. All prototypes obtained a good user satisfaction score, the highest mean score being 95.4 for the final prototype. The high-fidelity prototype showed an improvement in effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. However, the improvement is not statistically significant. This is possibly due to the small number of participants.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectElections -- Malta -- Equipment and supplies.en_GB
dc.subjectElectronic voting -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectVoting-machines -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectUser interfaces (Computer systems) -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectComputers and people with disabilities -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleVoting machine for people with disabilitiesen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Information and Communication Technology. Department of Computer Information Systemsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorGauci, Martina (2020)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacICT - 2020
Dissertations - FacICTCIS - 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20BITSD011.pdf
  Restricted Access
4.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.