Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/81257
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T10:54:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-17T10:54:35Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationVella, K. (2011). Evaluating the payback period and embodied energy in comparison to thermal insulation of different types of roof construction (Bachelor’s dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/81257-
dc.descriptionB.E.&A.(HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to identify the most thermally efficient roof from selected specimens, while also taking into consideration the overall costs of construction and embodied energy consumed. The test were carried out in lab conditions with the specimens tested representing a traditional roof, insulated roof, ventilated roof and an insulated roof remedial measure. These specimens cater for the types of energy efficient roofs mostly used in the Maltese Islands. Results suggest that the insulated roof is the most thermally efficient and the thicker the insulation the more efficient it becomes. However, this conflict with its resulting capital costs incurred and embodied energy used, as it was shown that the remedial measure would be the most expensive. It is not always feasible to install the highest U-Value insulation due to the high increase in cost and embodied energy consumed compared to the increase in thermal efficiency to thickness ratio. The designer has to keep in mind the needs of his structure so as to try to achieve the best solution in terms of all of the criteria.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRoofs -- Design and constructionen_GB
dc.subjectRoofsen_GB
dc.subjectRoofs -- Thermal propertiesen_GB
dc.subjectEnergy consumptionen_GB
dc.titleEvaluating the payback period and embodied energy in comparison to thermal insulation of different types of roof constructionen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty for the Built Environment. Department of Architecture and Urban Designen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorVella, Kyle (2011)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacBen - 1970-2018
Dissertations - FacBenAUD - 1970-2015

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
B.E._A.(HONS)_Vella_Kyle_2011.pdf
  Restricted Access
13.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.