Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-25T09:31:50Z
dc.date.available2016-02-25T09:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/8483
dc.descriptionM.ACCTY.en_GB
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Cash and accrual budgeting have long been seen as two competing approaches for presenting budgetary information. This divide can be seen in both the literature and in practice with different parties supporting different methods. Therefore, the main objective of this thesis is to present possible scenarios where the utilisation of both methods together can lead to a more useful budgetary statement without sacrificing understandability. Design: Both quantitative and qualitative research methods were utilised in compiling the necessary information for this study. A questionnaire was distributed to Maltese MPs in order to gather the necessary quantitative statistical data in their role as the users of the budget. Furthermore, certain MPs opted for an interview which greatly helped to gather further qualitative data which substantiated the data analysed. Furthermore, an interview was carried out with the budget office to further understand the perspective of the budget preparers. The existing pool of literature proved helpful in compiling the literature review and to structure the questionnaires. Findings: The findings showed that while compiling statements including both cash and accrual budgeting is both possible and useful, such a step can be considered to be slightly premature in the Maltese scenario. Only the existing statement relating to capital programmes and the introduction of a reconciliation statement, closely mirroring the cash statement in the private statement, can probably benefit from such changes at the current level of understanding of accrual concepts. Steps also need to be considered with respect to both the IT infrastructure and training the users of budget statements. Conclusion: Therefore, while cash and accrual budgeting can be combined to produce statements showing a more complete picture without sacrificing understandability, such a step may be considered to be slightly early in the Maltese scenario Value: While this study continues to add to the literature on the budget statement, this can also be considered to be of public interest as it provides insights of what may be required to introduce accrual budgeting in the public sector.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCash budgets -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectAccrual basis accounting -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectFinance, Public -- Malta -- Accountingen_GB
dc.titleReconciling cash and accrual budgeting in the public sectoren_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Accountancyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorXuereb, Jeremy
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacEma - 2015
Dissertations - FacEMAAcc - 2015

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15MACC095.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.