Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/85898| Title: | Comparing controlled system synthesis and suppression enforcement |
| Authors: | Aceto, Luca Cassar, Ian Francalanza, Adrian Ingólfsdóttir, Anna |
| Keywords: | Software engineering Computer programs -- Verification Component software System design Parallel processing (Electronic computers) |
| Issue Date: | 2021 |
| Publisher: | Springer-Verlag |
| Citation: | Aceto, L., Cassar, I., Francalanza, A., & Ingólfsdóttir, A. (2021). Comparing controlled system synthesis and suppression enforcement. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 23(4), 601-614. |
| Abstract: | Runtime enforcement and control system synthesis are two verification techniques that automate the process of transforming an erroneous system into a valid one. As both techniques can modify the behaviour of a system to prevent erroneous executions, they are both ideal for ensuring safety. In this paper, we investigate the interplay between these two techniques and identify control system synthesis as being the static counterpart to suppression-based runtime enforcement, in the context of safety properties. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/85898 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacICTCS |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparing controlled system synthesis.pdf Restricted Access | 771.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.