Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86622
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T13:58:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-10T13:58:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBorg, J. (2021). A comparative analysis between Malta and Victoria, Australia, on the right to independent living for people with disability (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/86622-
dc.descriptionM.A. (Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative research explored the extent to which residential services in Malta and Victoria, Australia are in line with Article 19 of the UNCRPD. An analysis of the development of independent living and relevant legislation, policies and practice in Malta and Australia was also carried out. The main research question was, “To what extent are residential services in both Malta and Victoria, Australia, in line with Article 19 of the UNCRPD?” Through this research question, a comparison was made between Malta and Australia on the available physical resource. Also a comparison on the implementation of certain aspects related to Article 19 such as choice, in-home support services and access to the community was performed. The second research question was, “What can Malta adopt from legislation, practices and policies in Victoria, Australia to implement and improve the available resources which are found in Malta to enforce Article 19 in the most effective manner?” Case studies were carried out to answer this research question to compare the processes and resources that both countries have in place and to ensure that the right to independent living is exercised. The findings which emerged in relation to the first research question were regarding choice, in-home support services and access to the community. These are related to Article 19. Other aspects arose which relate to whether Article 19 is being implemented or not such as training and funding. The findings of the second research question dealt with the legislation and policies which Malta should enforce to implement Article 19. The author concluded that Malta should implement legislation related to funding and propose guidelines regarding the type of housing people with disabilities should live in. This study highlights that although Malta has made drastic changes in the disability sector there is still room for improvement. As stated in this study and in the UNCRPD, people with disability have the right to live an independent life just like a non-disabled person with equal opportunities.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectConvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilitiesen_GB
dc.subjectPeople with disabilities -- Services for -- Law and legislation -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectPeople with disabilities -- Services for -- Law and legislation -- Australia -- Victoriaen_GB
dc.subjectHuman rights -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectHuman rights -- Australia -- Victoriaen_GB
dc.titleA comparative analysis between Malta and Victoria, Australia, on the right to independent living for people with disabilityen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Laws. Department of Public Lawen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorBorg, Jessica (2021)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2021
Dissertations - FacLawPub - 2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
21MAHRLP003.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.