Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89151
Title: Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice : the views of general practitioners in Europe
Authors: Brotons, Carlos
Bjfrkelund, Celia
Bulc, Mateja
Ciurana, Ramon
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Jurgova, Eva
Kloppe, Pilar
Lionis, Christos
Mierzecki, Artur
Pineiro, Rosa
Pullerits, Liivia
Sammut, Mario R.
Sheehan, Mary
Tataradze, Revaz
Thireos, Eleftherios
Vuchak, Jasna
Keywords: Health promotion
General practice (Medicine)
Family medicine
Physicians (General practice) -- Europe
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Citation: Brotons, C., Bjfrkelund, C., Bulc, M., Ciurana, R., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Jurgova, E.,…Vuchak, J. (2005). Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice : the views of general practitioners in Europe. Preventive Medicine, 40(5), 595-601.
Abstract: Background: Disease prevention and health promotion are important tasks in the daily practice of all general practitioners (GPs). The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge and attitudes of European GPs in implementing evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention recommendations in primary care, to describe GPs’ perceived barriers to implementing these recommendations and to assess how GPs’ own health behaviors affect their work with their patients. Methods: A postal multinational survey was carried out from June to December 2000 in a random sample of GPs listed from national colleges of each country. Results: Eleven European countries participated in the study, giving a total of 2082 GPs. Although GPs believe they should advise preventive and health promotion activities, in practice, they are less likely to do so. About 56.02% of the GPs answered that carrying-out prevention and health promotion activities are difficult. The two most important barriers reported were heavy workload/lack of time and no reimbursement. Associations between personal health behaviour and attitudes to health promotion or activities in prevention were found. GPs who smoked felt less effective in helping patients to reduce tobacco consumption than non-smoking GPs (39.34% versus 48.18%, P b 0.01). GPs who exercised felt that they were more effective in helping patients to practice regular physical exercise than sedentary GPs (59.14% versus 49.70%, P b 0.01). Conclusions: Significant gaps between GP’s knowledge and practices persist in the use of evidence-based recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in primary care.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/89151
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SFM

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prevention_and_health_promotion_in_clinical_practice_the_views_of_general_practitioners_in_Europe_2005.pdf
  Restricted Access
94.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.