Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/91735
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zerafa, Rosanne | - |
dc.contributor.author | Camilleri, Tracey A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Falzon, Owen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Camilleri, Kenneth P. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-18T07:03:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-18T07:03:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Zerafa, R., Camilleri, T., Falzon, O., & Camilleri, K. P. (2018). A comparison of a broad range of EEG acquisition devices–is there any difference for SSVEP BCIs?. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 5(4), 121-131. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/91735 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study compared the signal quality of six commercially available electroencephalography (EEG) signal acquisition systems in order to evaluate their application in a brain-computer interface (BCI). This is one of the largest studies in terms of subjects and systems focusing on comparing different EEG systems, involving the whole variety in terms of amplifier (research grade, consumer grade), electrode type (gel-based, saline-based, dry, active, passive), transmission technique (wired, wireless), and cost. We established an approach to evaluate the signal quality by means of a steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) experiment. This demonstrated that although high-end traditional EEG equipment may be the best choice for clinical applications, low-end wireless research grade gel-based EEG systems are comparable in terms of signal quality and therefore may be an effective alternative to BCIs developed for real environments. Other factors, such as end user and application, should also be considered when deciding which EEG system is best suited for a BCI. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Electrooculography | en_GB |
dc.subject | Brain-computer interfaces | en_GB |
dc.subject | Computer interfaces | en_GB |
dc.subject | Electroencephalography -- Data processing | en_GB |
dc.title | A comparison of a broad range of EEG acquisition devices – is there any difference for SSVEP BCIs? | en_GB |
dc.type | article | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/2326263X.2018.1550710 | - |
dc.publication.title | Brain-Computer Interfaces | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacEngSCE |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A comparison of a broad range of EEG acquisition devices.pdf Restricted Access | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.