Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/91907
Title: Efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cerebral vein thrombosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Riva, Nicoletta
Galea, Francesca
Buhagiar, Isaac
Gatt, Alexander
Calleja-Agius, Jean
Keywords: Cerebral veins
Thrombosis
Anticoagulants (Medicine)
Systematic reviews (Medical research)
Meta-analysis
Vitamin K
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Citation: Riva, N., Galea, F., Buhagiar, I., Gatt, A., & Calleja-Agius, J. (2022). Efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cerebral vein thrombosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Haematology, 10.1111/ane.13506.
Abstract: Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the standard oral anticoagulant treatment for patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). However, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) started replacing VKAs also in this setting. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the DOACs for CVT treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO protocol registration number CRD42020191472). The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, enrolling at least 10 adult patients with CVT treated with any DOACs. Twenty-three studies were included, for a total of 618 CVT patients treated with DOACs (treatment duration range 3-12 months). Mortality rate was 1.76% (95% CI, 0.70-3.24%; 12=0%; 5/428 patients, 18 studies); major bleeding 2.41% (95% CI, 1.26-3.91%; I2=1.5%; 12/534 patients, 21 studies); recurrent thrombosis 2.05% (95% CI, 1.04-3.37%; I2=0%; 10/577 patients, 21 studies); excellent neurological outcome 85.9% (95% CI, 79.0-91.7%; I2=63.7%; 289/340 patients, 13 studies); vessel recanalization 89.0% (95% CI, 82.9-93.9%; I2=62.7%; 316/359 patients, 16 studies). No significant differences emerged by study design (RCTs vs observational studies) or by treatment (DOACs vs VKAs). This systematic review showed that the DOACs might represent a reasonable oral anticoagulant treatment option for CVT patients.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/91907
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.