Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-04T09:17:33Z
dc.date.available2016-04-04T09:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/9283
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis study seeks to undertake a critical review of the remedies available under the domestic public procurement regime. On undertaking this review the author was constantly guided by the following research question: To what extent are domestic remedies capable of enabling effective review of decisions taken by contracting authorities? As it transpires there are various aspects relating to domestic remedies that can potentially inhibit the effective review of decisions. On the other hand, the timely review by the Court of Appeal (Superior Jurisdiction) appears conducive to an effective review. The following lists the most salient features of this study’s findings: a) The remedies competence inherent in the office of the Director of Contracts does not appear to be fully conducive to effective review of the decisions taken by contracting authorities; b) The remedies competence inherent in the Public Contracts Review Board does not appear to be fully conducive to effective review of the decisions taken by contracting authorities; c) For the sake of legal specificity, clarity and predictability the usage of explicit legal provisions are more desirable and thus consistent with better law making; d) Although timely decisions by the Court of Appeal are enabling effective review of the decisions taken by contracting authorities, the right of the parties to an effective remedy can potentially be better improved if cases undergo a more robust review at first instance stage; e) Legislative intervention at domestic and/or European level is desirable in order to ensure that an appropriate balance is struck between the free access to information and the protection of commercially sensitive data; f) The current system where recourse is directly made to quasi-judicial bodies rather than having to resort to pre-judicial remedies enables more efficient review and hence should be maintained. Further to the above findings, the author humbly puts forth legislative recommendations in an attempt to contribute towards better governance in the domestic public procurement regime, especially within the realm of remedies.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAppellate procedure -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectPublic contracts -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectGovernment purchasing -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleA critical review of the remedies available under the domestic public procurement regime in the light of EU developmentsen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Laws. Department of European & Comparative Lawen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorCalleja, Joseph
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2015
Dissertations - FacLawEC - 2015

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15LLD030.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.54 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.