Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/92945
Title: Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause – a national Maltese study
Authors: Mercieca, Nicole
Portelli, Jonathan L.
Jadva-Patel, H.
Keywords: Breast -- Radiography -- Standards -- Malta
Breast -- Radiography -- Malta -- Quality control
Breast -- Examination -- Malta
Breast -- Cancer -- Treatment -- Malta
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Mercieca, N., Portelli, J. L., & Jadva-Patel, H. (2017). Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause – a national Maltese Study. Radiography, 23(1), 25-31.
Abstract: Mammography is used as a first-line investigation in the detection of breast cancer and imaging is required to be of optimal quality and achieved without adverse effects on the health of individuals. Repeated images come at a cost in terms of radiation dose, discomfort to clients and unnecessary financial burdens. No studies investigating mammography quality in Malta had been previously undertaken. Hence, this research aimed to investigate whether mammography is being performed at an acceptable level, through the investigation of reject rates. Quantitative methodology was used to collect data from eight participating mammography units, which were utilising screen film (SFM), computed radiography (CR) and direct digital mammography (DDM). Data relating to the total number of images performed, rejects and causes was prospectively collected over two weeks, resulting in a sample of 2291 images. All units were also asked to answer a questionnaire which provided other data that could be used for analysis. The national mammography reject rate was found to be 2.62%; within the 3% acceptable range. Individual rates' analysis revealed unacceptably high or low reject rates in some units. Positioning was the main reject cause. No significant difference in rejection was found between different types of mammography units or radiographers' experience. Alternatively, radiographers' qualifications, employment conditions and use of rejection criteria were proven to affect reject rates. Whilst on a national level, images are being rejected at an acceptable rate, individual units revealed suboptimal rates; at the cost of extra radiation, added discomfort and financial burden.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/92945
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mammographic_image_reject_rate_analysis_and_cause_a_National_Maltese_study_2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
737.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.