Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/93042
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorgan Snell, L.-
dc.contributor.authorNicksic, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorPanteli, Dimitra-
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorEissenberg, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorFattore, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorGauci, Charmaine-
dc.contributor.authorKoprivnikar, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorMurauskiene, Liuba-
dc.contributor.authorReinap, Marge-
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Andrew J.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T05:02:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-06T05:02:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMorgan Snell, L., Nicksic, N., Panteli, D. Burke, S., Eissenberg, T., Fattore, G.,…Barnes, A. J. (2021). Emerging electronic cigarette policies in European member states, Canada, and the United States. Health Policy, 125(4), 425-435.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/93042-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Increased electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has motivated new regulations to address the changing landscape of tobacco use and promote public health.Method: This policy scan compares ECIG prevalence and regulations in the European Union (EU), Canada,and the United States (US) at the federal- and local-level to foster a policy dialogue around modern tobacco prevention and control regulations.Results: Among young adults, 40 % in the US, 29 % in Canada, and 28 % in the EU report ever using an ECIG.Results from the policy scan find significant variation in approach to regulating ECIGs. EU member states are subject to the most stringent requirements regarding nicotine concentration regulations, and several member states have also opted to ban flavors and/or require plain packaging or out of sight retail sales.Among EU and US states, taxation is a popular strategy, though taxing strategies vary widely. Regarding youth use, US states have led the way for increasing the legal age of sale to 21 at the federal level, andin Canada recent federal regulations are innovative in their approach to banning advertising that may appeal to youth.Conclusion: Strategies to achieve public health goals related to ECIGs vary widely, with federalism playing an important role in policy innovation, offering opportunities to evaluate their effectiveness and inform future regulations.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectElectronic cigarettesen_GB
dc.subjectVapingen_GB
dc.subjectMedical policyen_GB
dc.subjectTobaccoen_GB
dc.titleEmerging electronic cigarette policies in European member states, Canada, and the United Statesen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.003-
dc.publication.titleHealth Policyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SPH

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Emerging_electronic_cigarette_policies_in_European_member_states_Canada_and_the_United_States_2021.pdf
  Restricted Access
841.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.