Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95096
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T08:49:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T08:49:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationZammit, A. (2015). Reinventing a historic city. My Liveable City, 2(1), 80-86.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/95096-
dc.description.abstractDr Antoine Zammit takes a look at the city of Valletta that has implemented the technique of adaptive reuse and shows us its wider implications. Malta is currently undergoing a renewed wave of adaptive reuse strategies. This is due to a number of reasons. Most certainly, it is partly a response to existing market conditions, which in recent decades have been characterised by constant (often speculative) residential construction. This has often resulted in the demolition of traditional two-storey houses and their rebuilding into apartment blocks located on the outskirts of towns and villages. The recent building boom (particularly between 2002 – 2008) provided a strong property market resulting in an environment dominated by ‘quantity’, as opposed to ‘quality’ considerations and generating a surplus of small apartments with rooms sharing poorly lit and ventilated internal yards. In addition, the increase in prices of apartments implied that it cost as much to buy a small finished apartment within a complex of internal developments as a larger older house, albeit not necessarily centrally located and requiring some restructuring. The reduction in quality for the newer stock of apartments and their corresponding increase in prices is pushing a number of younger couples to opt for the purchase of older houses and redeveloping them to suit their needs. In tandem with the above, the increased adaptive reuse of existing building stock has also been the direct result of government incentives and the channelling of EU Structural Funds in order to revive Urban Conservation Areas that became depleted of younger generations as they moved out to the newer edges. EU Funds have also been used to restore and rehabilitate a number of historical buildings, which have lent themselves to new uses. Such rehabilitation is best exemplified within the island’s capital city, Valletta.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherShashikala Venkatramanen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCity planning -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectDwellings -- Remodeling -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectArchitecture, Domestic -- Conservation and restorationen_GB
dc.subjectHistoric buildings -- Malta -- Vallettaen_GB
dc.subjectUrban renewal -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectSustainable urban development -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleReinventing a historic cityen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewednon peer-revieweden_GB
dc.publication.titleMy Liveable Cityen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorZammit, Antoine-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacBenSPI

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reinventing_a_historic_city_2015.pdf602.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.