Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96465
Title: Judicial review of administrative action : developments and contradictions
Authors: Borg, Tonio
Keywords: Judicial review of administrative acts -- Malta
Judicial review -- Malta -- Cases
Ultra vires -- Malta
Administrative law -- Malta
Government liability -- Malta
Issue Date: 2021-08
Publisher: Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi
Citation: Borg, T. (2021). Judicial review of administrative action: developments and contradictions. Id-Dritt, 31, 3-17.
Abstract: 1. Introduction: Recent developments in the area of Judicial Review under Administrative Law have occurred, which are of importance for an understanding of the subject. I shall deal with these not in a chronological order, but in order of importance. I shall also examine some contradictions, not necessarily recent, which plague the jurisprudence of the Maltese Courts on this subject. The most important development in the area of Administrative Law in the recent past, has been the debunking of the norm contained in Article 460 of Chapter 12, introduced in 1981. which stated that a plaintiff instituting a case against the Government has to present, under pain of nullity, a judicial act informing the Government of his claims, at least ten days prior to instituting action. This, of course, applied also to any judicial review against the Government under Administrative Law. [excerpt]
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96465
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacLawPub

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Judicial_review_of_administrative_action_developments_and_contradictions_2021.PDF
  Restricted Access
472.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.