Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96473
Title: The perils of positivist thinking in public law
Authors: Borg, Tonio
Keywords: Public law -- Malta
Constitutional law -- Malta -- Cases
Legal positivism
Republic Day, 1974
Constitutional history -- Malta -- 20th century
Cremona, John J., 1918-2020 -- Criticism and interpretation
Mizzi, Edgar, 1921-2000
Issue Date: 2020-09
Publisher: Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi
Citation: Borg, T. (2020). The perils of positivist thinking in public law. Id-Dritt, 30, 25-43.
Abstract: Introduction: The positivist approach to legal interpretation is based on a particular philosophical idea of law; namely, that law is a command by a superior to an inferior in the interest of society, a strict application of the law is a must and no further interpretation is necessary except the clear wording of the law. Naturally, this approach, laudable though it might seem, can create problems. Laws are created in a contest, historical, social or political. The law drafters cannot create perfect legislation, leading to loopholes and unclear provisions. But, above all, the reasonable interpretation of statutory provisions is necessary in order to prevent unreasonable consequences or conclusions. [excerpt]
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96473
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacLawPub

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The_perils_of_positivist_thinking_in_public_law_Id_Dritt_2020.pdf
  Restricted Access
266.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.