Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96473
Title: | The perils of positivist thinking in public law |
Authors: | Borg, Tonio |
Keywords: | Public law -- Malta Constitutional law -- Malta -- Cases Legal positivism Republic Day, 1974 Constitutional history -- Malta -- 20th century Cremona, John J., 1918-2020 -- Criticism and interpretation Mizzi, Edgar, 1921-2000 |
Issue Date: | 2020-09 |
Publisher: | Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi |
Citation: | Borg, T. (2020). The perils of positivist thinking in public law. Id-Dritt, 30, 25-43. |
Abstract: | Introduction: The positivist approach to legal interpretation is based on a particular philosophical idea of law; namely, that law is a command by a superior to an inferior in the interest of society, a strict application of the law is a must and no further interpretation is necessary except the clear wording of the law. Naturally, this approach, laudable though it might seem, can create problems. Laws are created in a contest, historical, social or political. The law drafters cannot create perfect legislation, leading to loopholes and unclear provisions. But, above all, the reasonable interpretation of statutory provisions is necessary in order to prevent unreasonable consequences or conclusions. [excerpt] |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/96473 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacLawPub |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The_perils_of_positivist_thinking_in_public_law_Id_Dritt_2020.pdf Restricted Access | 266.67 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.