Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPérez‑Panero, Alberto J.-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz‑Muñoz, María-
dc.contributor.authorFernández‑Torres, Raúl-
dc.contributor.authorFormosa, Cynthia-
dc.contributor.authorGatt, Alfred-
dc.contributor.authorGónzalez‑Sánchez, Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T09:00:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-12T09:00:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPerez-Panero, A. J., Ruiz-Munoz, M., Fernandez-Torres, R., Formosa, C., Gatt, A., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, M. (2021). Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 30(12), 3395-3405.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyse patients’ perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract and analyse the values of their measurement properties.en_GB
dc.description.abstractMethods: Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test–retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness.en_GB
dc.description.abstractResults: The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQUMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties.en_GB
dc.description.abstractConclusion: According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectDiabetic foot -- Treatmenten_GB
dc.subjectDiabetics -- Attitudesen_GB
dc.subjectDiabetes -- Complicationsen_GB
dc.subjectDiabetic neuropathiesen_GB
dc.subjectFoot -- Diseasesen_GB
dc.titleDiabetic foot disease : a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measuresen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4-
dc.publication.titleQuality of Life Researchen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScPod

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Diabetic foot disease a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures 2021.pdf
  Restricted Access
699.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.