Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598
Title: Diabetic foot disease : a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
Authors: Pérez‑Panero, Alberto J.
Ruiz‑Muñoz, María
Fernández‑Torres, Raúl
Formosa, Cynthia
Gatt, Alfred
Gónzalez‑Sánchez, Manuel
Keywords: Diabetic foot -- Treatment
Diabetics -- Attitudes
Diabetes -- Complications
Diabetic neuropathies
Foot -- Diseases
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Perez-Panero, A. J., Ruiz-Munoz, M., Fernandez-Torres, R., Formosa, C., Gatt, A., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, M. (2021). Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 30(12), 3395-3405.
Abstract: Purpose: Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyse patients’ perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract and analyse the values of their measurement properties.
Methods: Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test–retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness.
Results: The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQUMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties.
Conclusion: According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScPod

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Diabetic foot disease a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures 2021.pdf
  Restricted Access
699.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.