Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598
Title: | Diabetic foot disease : a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures |
Authors: | Pérez‑Panero, Alberto J. Ruiz‑Muñoz, María Fernández‑Torres, Raúl Formosa, Cynthia Gatt, Alfred Gónzalez‑Sánchez, Manuel |
Keywords: | Diabetic foot -- Treatment Diabetics -- Attitudes Diabetes -- Complications Diabetic neuropathies Foot -- Diseases |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Citation: | Perez-Panero, A. J., Ruiz-Munoz, M., Fernandez-Torres, R., Formosa, C., Gatt, A., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, M. (2021). Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 30(12), 3395-3405. |
Abstract: | Purpose: Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome
measures (PROMs) analyse patients’ perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to
conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract
and analyse the values of their measurement properties. Methods: Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test–retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness. Results: The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQUMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties. Conclusion: According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100598 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacHScPod |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diabetic foot disease a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures 2021.pdf Restricted Access | 699.84 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.