Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101407
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMayo, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-02T09:29:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-02T09:29:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationMayo, P. (2012). Globalisation, democracy and the HE market. In C. Kościelniak, & J. Makowski (Eds.), Freedom Equality University, (pp. 125-140). Warsaw: Civic Institute.en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn9788393379446-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101407-
dc.description.abstractHigher Education (henceforth HE) is believed to play a key part in the process of globalisation. It is, as a result, being transformed, mainly within the context of the European Union which had set itself the ambitious and unlikely target of becoming the most powerful and competitive ‘knowledge economy’ in the world by the Year 2010 (EC, 2000). Nevertheless, “globalisation is not a single or universal phenomenon. It is nuanced according to locality (local area, nation, world region), language(s) of use, and academic cultures; and it plays out very differently according to the type of institution.” (Marginson and Wende 2007, p.5). In this paper, I take a critical look at some key features of the contemporary discourse surrounding HE within the context of globalisation. I will do so with specific reference to the EU discourse in this area of educational provision and explore prospects for the relationship between HE and democracy. I argue that this discourse pushes state policies regarding HE in the direction of the emergence of a ‘competition state.’(Jessop, 2002). According to Mulderrig (2008), drawing on Jessop (2002), the competition state was already conceived of in the 80s with, for instance, OECD documents “on the importance of structural competitiveness for government policy.’ (Mulderrig, 2008, p. 168). The competition state provides a “focus on securing the economic and extra-economic conditions for international competitiveness in a globalising KBE” (knowledge based economy) (Fairclough and Wodak, 2008, p. 112). The discursive contexts (vide ibidem) in which HE policies are formulated, such as the Lisbon Objectives (EC, 2000) and the Bologna Processii (Confederation of EU Rectors Conferences and Association of European Universities, 2000), provide both constraints and opportunities for actors, institutions, markets and states.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWarsaw Civic Instituteen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectEducation, Higheren_GB
dc.subjectGlobalizationen_GB
dc.subjectUniversities and collegesen_GB
dc.titleGlobalisation, democracy and the HE marketen_GB
dc.title.alternativeFreedom Equality Universityen_GB
dc.typebookParten_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEduAOCAE

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Globalisation_democracy_and_the_HE_market_2012.pdf
  Restricted Access
597.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.