Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106951
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T08:35:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-02T08:35:59Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationVassallo, M. (2022). Analysis of sea waves data for the Maltese Islands (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106951-
dc.descriptionM.Sc.(Melit.) Sust.Energyen_GB
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation analyses different sources of sea waves data for the Maltese Islands. The first aim was to establish the comparability of different datasets, be it modelled or measured, hindcast or forecast, for the purpose of operational use. The second aim was to asses the power potential, using the same datasets as before, and investigating the applicability of different Wave Energy Converters (WECs). The dataset sources considered are the following: Directional Wave Spectral Drifter (buoy), HF Radar, Satellite, Copernicus model, and ROSARIOSWAN model. The ROSARIOSWAN model used in this work is one which has yet to be extensively validated and fine tuned, and so, this work serves to contribute to its further development. The inter-comparison of data from the considered datasets (excluding HF radar) generally yielded the the best correlation for the significant wave height (SWH) comparison, and the worst for the peak period comparison. ROSARIOSWAN models tend to overestimate the buoy values, while the Copernicus model compares better, despite lower resolution. Filtering out data with lower SWH yielded better correlation for all but the SWH parameter, when comparing buoy and model data. Two prominent wave directions, East and North-West, resulted from this analysis. The wave power potential analysis indicated that the Maltese Islands have a low potential for wave energy extraction (Class I) due to, mainly, low SWH; this is typical of enclosed seas. In addition, high variability in the Maltese Waters further worsen the situation. The WEC found to be most suitable in this study is the point absorber Wavestar C6 which, at the buoy position, has an annual average output power of 192.7 kW and capacity factor of 32.1%.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectOceanography -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectOcean waves -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectOcean waves -- Simulation methodsen_GB
dc.subjectOcean wave power -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleAnalysis of sea waves data for the Maltese Islandsen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentInstitute for Sustainable Energyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorVassallo, Martina (2022)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - InsSE - 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2218ISEISE533005058753_1.PDF10.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.