Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107246
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGasperini, Alessandra Marcon-
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Angel-
dc.contributor.authorMagan, Naresh-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T12:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T12:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationGasperini, A. M., Medina, A., & Magan, N. (2022). Comparison of growth and aflatoxin B1 production profiles of Aspergillus flavus strains on conventional and isogenic GM-maize-based nutritional matrices. Fungal Biology, 126(1), 82-90.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107246-
dc.description.abstractMaize grown in both North and South America are now predominantly genetically modified (GM) cultivars with some resistance to herbicide, pesticide, or both. There is little information on the relative colonisation and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) production with maize meal-based nutritional matrices based on kernels of non-GM maize and isogenic GM-ones by strains of Aspergillus flavus. The objectives were to examine the effect of interacting conditions of temperature (25–35 °C) and water availability (0.99–0.90 water activity, aw) on (a) mycelial growth, (b) AFB1 production and (c) develop contour maps of optimum and marginal conditions of these parameters for four strains of A. flavus on three different non-GM and isogenic GM-maize based nutritional media. The growth of the four strains of A. flavus (three aflatoxigenic; one non-aflatoxigenic) was relatively similar in relation to the temperature × aw conditions examined on both non-GM and GM-based matrices. Optimum growth overall was at 30–35 °C and 0.99 aw for all four strains. Under water stress (0.90 aw) growth was optimum at 35 °C. Statistically: non-GM, GM cultivars, temperature and aw all significantly affected growth rates. For AFB1 production, all single and interacting factors were statistically significant except for non-GM × GM cultivar. In conclusion, colonisation of GM- and non-GM nutritional sources was similar for the different A. flavus strains examined. The contour maps will be very useful for understanding the ecological niches for both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains in the context of the competitive exclusion of those producing aflatoxins.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectGenetically modified foodsen_GB
dc.subjectTemperature controlen_GB
dc.subjectFood -- Water activityen_GB
dc.subjectGrowth -- Researchen_GB
dc.subjectMycotoxins -- Metabolismen_GB
dc.titleComparison of growth and aflatoxin B1 production profiles of Aspergillus flavus strains on conventional and isogenic GM-maize-based nutritional matricesen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.funbio.2021.10.006-
dc.publication.titleFungal Biologyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScFSEH



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.