Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119234
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T13:52:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-01T13:52:18Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAbela, A. (2021). Multi-modality and multi-sensor image registration for satellite images (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119234-
dc.descriptionM.Sc.(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractSatellite imagery provides information which is fundamental to remote sensing applications. Two of such applications are image registration and fusion of hyperspectral and multispectral imagery. Image registration is a fundamental pre-processing step to image fusion. Conjunctively, in remote sensing little previous work aimed at the registration of satellite imagery with significant scale differences and the registration of multi-modal satellite images. The aim of this work was to do a comprehensive analysis of registration techniques in remote sensing. The SIFT algorithm with different parameter sets was utilised to register thermal-thermal satellite imagery with significant scale differences. The work also examined and compared the use of other feature-based, area-based and optical flow-based techniques for the registration of multi-modal and multi-sensorial satellite imagery. The multi-modal data includes optical satellite imagery from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. SAR images from Sentinel-1 and thermal images from Landsat-8 and Sentinel-3. The findings of this study show that the most common type of modality utilised in the image registration of remote sensing data is Optical-Optical and synthetic aperure radar (SAR)-Optical. For the registration of thermal Landsat-8 to Landsat-8 and thermal Landsat-8 to Sentinel-3, the general pattern was that as one upscaled the sensed image, the misregistration and RMSE increased due to a higher scale difference. For the registration of SAR-Optical satellite imagery the overall best performing was SIFT-Flow. For the registration of single modality data, the overall best was SIFT followed by the Enhanced Correlation Coefficient (ECC). For the registration of multi-modal satellite imagery, the overall best was SIFT.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRemote-sensing imagesen_GB
dc.subjectImage registrationen_GB
dc.subjectGeographical location codesen_GB
dc.titleMulti-modality and multi-sensor image registration for satellite imagesen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Information and Communication Technology. Department of Communications and Computer Engineeringen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorAbela, Aaron (2021)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacICT - 2021
Dissertations - FacICTCCE - 2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2119ICTCCE591200000011_1.PDF68.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.