Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-18T13:54:46Z
dc.date.available2017-01-18T13:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/15594
dc.descriptionB.SC.(HONS)NURSINGen_GB
dc.description.abstractThe present dissertation will compare the effectiveness of Mitomycin with the standard treatment BCG to evaluate which agent is superior in reducing tumour recurrences. Using the PICO framework, the research question was framed as follows; “Is mitomycin more effective than BCG in reducing tumour recurrence in patients with high risk superficial bladder cancer”. PICO elements: Patients with intermediate to high risk superficial bladder as the population, Mitomycin as a treatment intervention and BCG as the comparison intervention. The expected outcome was reduction in tumour recurrence. The eligible criteria included: English language, peer-reviewed studies published the last eleven years; both genders, all age groups and ethnic groups that had intermediate-high risk, superficial invasion, academic journals related to oncology, urology and pharmacological settings, reviews, RCTs and observational studies. Exclusion criteria were the studies that failed to meet the eligible criteria. The search yielded one systematic review, three meta-analyses, two randomised prospective studies and a retrospective study. The CASP tools were utilised to conduct a critical appraisal. Tumour recurrence was the primary outcome measured, whereas tumour progression, survival and side-effects were secondary outcomes. Results: BCG continued to be preferred over Mitomycin in reducing recurrence in highrisk tumours. However, there was no significance difference with intermediate-high risk tumours. Mitomycin was more effective when BCG maintenance was not administered. These findings imply that the outcome result is based on the tumour characteristics and the maintenance regime. Therefore findings to support EBP, are at this stage, inconclusive. Recommendations: Introduce Mitomycin for intermediate risk and BCG incompatibilities, further studies to identify ideal schedules for both agents, conducting a local study with homogenous population and treatment schedule, healthcare professionals and patient education to enhance the effectiveness of treatment.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBladder -- Canceren_GB
dc.subjectBCG vaccinesen_GB
dc.subjectMitomycin Cen_GB
dc.subjectCancer -- Relapse -- Preventionen_GB
dc.titleMitomycin versus BCG to reduce recurrence in intermediate to high risk superficial bladder canceren_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences. Department of Nursingen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorSpagnol, Maria
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacHSc - 2016
Dissertations - FacHScNur - 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16BSNR55.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.