Gramsci and Educational Thought
Collection home page
Statistics
As the editor of this book Peter Mayo has provided an appropriate context in which to view the excellent contributions to this monograph in the year of Gramsci’s anniversary. I remember inviting Peter to edit the original special issue of Educational Philosophy and Theory when I visited Malta for the International Network of Philosophers of Education Conference in 2006 (http://www.ucm.es/info/inpe/). As Editor I was pleased to be able to offer Peter the opportunity to display the best of Gramsci’s scholarship in the field of education and also to meet with him and his colleagues at the University of Malta, including Kenneth Wain, Carmel Borg and others. Peter Mayo rightly emphasizes that Gramsci’s prison writings constitute an educational project based on the valuable concept of hegemony that Gramsci develops as an essential part of the sociology of capitalist society enabling an understanding of the manufacture of consent by the powerful through the institution of cultural values. I have nothing to add to what the contributors have made clear in their individual chapters and applaud the new scholarship on Gramsci’s educational project—its origins, its enactment in the context of the party, its applications to ‘global English’ and women’s ‘ways of knowing, its contribution to the envisioning of the project of socialist education in Brazil. Gramsci’s analysis of Fordism and education in the age of Fordism has a new relevance with the global recession, the neoliberal meltdown and end of the ideology of automobilism. In 1934 in insightful notes in the Prison Notebooks Antonio Gramsci defined ‘Americanism’ as ‘mechanicist’, crude, brutal—‘pure action’ in other words—and contrasted it with tradition. He attempted to demonstrate how Fordism was destructive of trade unions leading to a crisis in high wages, hegemonic at the point of production and the production of new Taylorized workers. Fordist production entailing an intensified industrial division of labor, assembly line flow of work with increasingly specified tasks by management, increased the potential for capitalist control over the pace and intensity of work and led to the displacement of craft-based production in which skilled laborers exercised substantial control over their conditions of work. (Extract from the Foreword to this book)
Edited by
Peter Mayo
Published and produced in 2010 by Wiley-Blackwell
ISBN: 9781444333947
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may
be reproduced without the prior written permission
of the publishers and the individual authors of the chapters.
Collection's Items (Sorted by Submit Date in Descending order): 1 to 12 of 12
Issue Date | Title | Author(s) |
2010 | Contents and notes on contributors | - |
2010 | The revolutionary party in Gramsci’s pre-prison educational and political theory and practice | Holst, John D. |
2010 | Antonio Gramsci and feminism : the elusive nature of power | Ledwith, Margaret |
2010 | Towards a political theory of social work and education (Translated by Florian Sichling with editing by Peter Mayo) | Hirschfeld, Uwe |
2010 | Gramscian thought and Brazilian education | Dore Soares, Rosemary |
2010 | Index | - |
2010 | A brief commentary on the Hegelian-Marxist origins of Gramsci’s ‘Philosophy of Praxis’ | Hill, Deb J. |
2010 | Introducing Giovanni Gentile, the ‘Philosopher of Fascism’ | Clayton, Thomas |
2010 | Foreword | Peters, Michael A. |
2010 | Antonio Gramsci and his relevance to the education of adults | Mayo, Peter |
2010 | Global English, hegemony and education : lessons from Gramsci | Ives, Peter |
2010 | Introduction: Antonio Gramsci and educational thought | Mayo, Peter |
Collection's Items (Sorted by Submit Date in Descending order): 1 to 12 of 12