Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45806
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBatrancea, Larissa-
dc.contributor.authorNichita, Anca-
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Jerome-
dc.contributor.authorKogler, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorKirchler, Erich-
dc.contributor.authorHoelzl, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorBriguglio, Marie-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-22T08:43:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-22T08:43:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBatrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E.,… Zukauskas, S. (2019). Trust, power, and tax compliance : an experimental scenario study in 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, 102191.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45806-
dc.description.abstractThe slippery slope framework of tax compliance emphasizes the importance of trust in authorities as a substantial determinant of tax compliance alongside traditional enforcement tools like audits and fines. Using data from an experimental scenario study in 44 nations from five continents (N = 14,509), we find that trust in authorities and power of authorities, as defined in the slippery slope framework, increase tax compliance intentions and mitigate intended tax evasion across societies that differ in economic, sociodemographic, political, and cultural backgrounds. We also show that trust and power foster compliance through different channels: trusted authorities (those perceived as benevolent and enhancing the common good) register the highest voluntary compliance, while powerful authorities (those perceived as effectively controlling evasion) register the highest enforced compliance. In contrast to some previous studies, the results suggest that trust and power are not fully complementary, as indicated by a negative interaction effect. Despite some between-country variations, trust and power are identified as important determinants of tax compliance across all nations. These findings have clear implications for authorities across the globe that need to choose best practices for tax collection.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectTaxpayer complianceen_GB
dc.subjectTaxation -- Compliance costsen_GB
dc.subjectTax collectionen_GB
dc.subjectTax administration and procedureen_GB
dc.titleTrust, power, and tax compliance : an experimental scenario study in 44 nationsen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191-
dc.publication.titleJournal of Economic Psychologyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEMAEco

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Trust,_power,_and_tax_compliance_an_experimental_scenario_study_in_44_nations_2019.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.