Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/65137
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T07:38:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-03T07:38:48Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationEdlebi, S. (2012). Smoking cessation : comparing the effectiveness of NRT with behavioural therapy (Bachelor's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/65137-
dc.descriptionB.SC.(HONS)NURSINGen_GB
dc.description.abstractBackground - Tobacco smoke is associated with chemical and psychosocial addictions, and many health risks. This review of the evidence aims to explore which smoking cessation interventions provide smokers with the best chance to quit. Thus the research question: Does NRT offer adult smokers aged 18+, smoking two or more cigarettes daily, a better chance to quit smoking for over 6 months than Behavioural Therapy or a combination of both? Method - A search for randomised controlled trials, meta-analysis of trials and systematic reviews of studies conducted in economically developed countries was conducted, excluding literature published prior to 2005, studies of participants that did not smoke daily, or studies on adolescents and pregnant women. Eight research studies and 10 systematic reviews were found and appraised using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force critical appraisal tool, the Harbour and Miller Tool, the Cochrane Collaboration Quality Assessment Tool and the AMSTAR tool. Results - Combination of therapies resulted in the highest smoking cessation rates. Success rates for NRT alone resulted in quit rates ranging from 20-70%. Behavioural Therapies were most successful when delivered face-to-face over~ 20 minutes with success rates of up to 25%. Health-professional delivered therapy remains the focus of smoking cessation interventions. Conclusion - The evidence suggests that a combination of Behavioural Therapy with sessions lasting over 20 minutes, supported by written material, and NRT tailored to the smoker's nicotine dependence level, offered in the form of patches and lozenges in reducing dosages for 8-12 weeks enhance chances of quitting smoking. Implications and Recommendations - Accessibility of smoking cessation interventions can be improved by offering sessions in various settings. Nicotine Replacement Therapy should be offered for free under the Schedule V Act so as to encourage its use. Further research is needed to determine the most effective intensity and frequency of Behavioural Therapy.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectHealth promotionen_GB
dc.subjectSmoking cessationen_GB
dc.subjectNicotine -- Therapeutic useen_GB
dc.subjectSmokingen_GB
dc.titleSmoking cessation : comparing the effectiveness of NRT with behavioural therapyen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences. Department of Nursingen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorEdlebi, Sacha-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacHSc - 2012
Dissertations - FacHScNur - 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Edlebi_Sacha_Smoking Cessation Comparing the Effectiveness of NRT with Behavioural Therapy.PDF
  Restricted Access
3.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.