Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/65515
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T08:27:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-11T08:27:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationTheuma, S. (2012). Post-operative pain relief : patient controlled analgesia versus epidural (Bachelor’s dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/65515-
dc.descriptionB.SC.(HONS)NURSINGen_GB
dc.description.abstractUnfortunately, even-though a lot progress has been done in pain relief, postoperative pain is often mismanaged. This not only makes the patient feel the pain but also brings particularly detrimental physical effects upon the patient. Consequently, more hospital resources and time are utilised. Also, offering the patients the best pain relief method can reduce serious consequences. The research question of this study is "Post-operative pain relief: Patient controlled Analgesia versus Epidural. The population is made up of people who undergone major surgery; the intervention is that of post-operative pain relief, while the comparison is PCA pump or Epidural infusion. Hence the outcome highlights which intervention provides the most beneficial effect postoperatively. Data was gathered through the use of articles according to inclusion criteria. This includes articles regarding the IV-PCA, studies mentioning males and females as well as those about the side effects that occur postoperatively. However, exclusion criteria incorporated non-English articles and articles relating to labour in which epidural is used. Other studies excluded ranged from paediatrics to 18 year olds. Pre-1980 articles were also eliminated. 12 articles, 5RCT's, 5COHORT's and 2Reviews, were then appraised using the CASP tools. Consequently, the articles covered showed that the epidural was utilised more than the PCA. Future studies based on clinical trials need to be conducted as regards the drug used in the epidural, while the patient is monitored on a 48hour period. Protocols also need to be formulated for the benefit of ward nurses and patients.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectPostoperative care -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectAnalgesia -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectPeridural anesthesia -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectPain -- Treatmenten_GB
dc.titlePost-operative pain relief : patient controlled analgesia versus epiduralen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences. Department of Nursingen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorTheuma, Samantha-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacHScNur - 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Theuma_Samantha_POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA VERSUS EPIDURAL.pdf
  Restricted Access
4.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.